Click to get your own widget
The models just keep looking worse and worse.  And we are spending trillions based on this???
(Thanks to Anythony Watts at

Model Prediction failure  hansen temp
climate therm
Rest assured, they are after the money:
Enderhofer quote
U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres speaks during an interview at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 22, 2014. AP
At a news conference .. in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.


Normal Climate --Would you prefer this?!  ^

   Satellite Data CO2_levels  GreenlandIce

pause?  or normal variation? ^  Past CO2 levels ^ Past Temp according to Greenland Ice ^

temp over the past  Europe ice ages

GISS vs Sat
cost of electricity ChinavsUS  PlanetEarth

mean sea level NY
Good Sea Level rise summary
CRU has Finally given up the hockey stick lie!  graphs
(thanks to Steve McIntyre of )
It's the Sun, Stupid! Look here and here...
Its the Supernovae, stupid...   here
These are the only three graphs you need to see... electricity, temperature, polluters
Even the IPCC knows the game is up 12-2012: look at graph
The liberal-academic-industrial complex - much like the complexes Eisenhower warned us about.
James Hansen finally admits climate won't kill us tomorrow
Climate Models cannot predict the climate
Global Warming Petition Project
Ode to the welfare state
A sober look at alternative energies
Green cars aren't always so green
Cost of wind/solar
Climate Money Story
Even Google says no hope for alternate energy
.....analysis of article
Great Discussion of Climate Change Conspiracy
Deep Sixing the 97% consensus argument
Great Argument showing AGW Failure
Electric vehicles pollute as much as gas
Unbelievable...  Att Gen Lynch on prosecuting Climate Change "Deniers"
Roger pielke too true lament.
Scott Adams explains it all
IPCC Third Assessment Report, The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible
NASA data tampering
William Connollley Tampering of wikipedia

Even if one were to electrify all of transport, industry, heating and so on, so much renewable generation and balancing/storage equipment would be needed to power it that astronomical new requirements for steel, concrete, copper, glass, carbon fibre, neodymium, shipping and haulage etc etc would appear. All these things are made using mammoth amounts of energy: far from achieving massive energy savings, which most plans for a renewables future rely on implicitly, we would wind up needing far more energy, which would mean even more vast renewables farms  and even more materials and energy to make and maintain them and so on. The scale of the building would be like nothing ever attempted by the human race.

There are five official temperature data records. Three of these are based on measurements taken on the Earths surface, versions of which are then compiled by Giss, by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and by the University of East Anglias Climatic Research Unit working with the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction, part of the UK Met Office. The other two records are derived from measurements made by satellites, and then compiled by Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) in California and the University of Alabama, Huntsville (UAH).

Science is all about the continual testing of theories to ensure they are still valid, which is why the global warming cults tut-tutting reply The science is settled is a non-sequitur.  Ed Driscoll

95% of all CO2 emitted each year is natural  - various sources.  Hard to believe the 5% emitted by humans has much effect.  And "balance"  -- what is that and what should it be?   CO2 has been higher and lower in the past.

Theres too much authority and too little hard facts in much of science today. Well, actually there always has been, but with grant money flowing only to those who conform to the consensus its really bad now.  Jerry Pournelle

Drax, Britains biggest power station, received more than 450 million in subsidies in 2015 for burning biomass, which was mostly American wood pellets. 
[....ignoring the coal under the ground of course.]   Curiously, there are over 200 trillion cubic feet of dead trees stored under Lancashire. They may have been very very small trees, like algae sized, but nonetheless, 4,999 kilometers closer. Apparently when all the trees of Canada and the US are used up, and the UK moves out of the Wood Age, it will have some spare gas  to heat UK homes for the next 1,200 years.   Jo Nova 2-26-2017

"For more than a decade
, climate scientist/activist James Hansen has been clear on the daunting math of CO2 reduction. He first stated that the world had ten years to reverse course on fossil-fuel reliance, a prediction made in 2006 in The New York Review of Books.  When that prediction came due, Hansen floated the need to go emissions-negative. Wow! Then, just a couple of months later, he recanted to say that we still have time to turn things around. (The ponderous response of the climate system also means that we dont need to instantaneously reduce GHG amounts.) Lots of confusion, to say the least, from the father of climate alarmism."  Robert Bradley WUWT 3-27-2017

"A deciding factor was that I no longer know what to say to students and postdocs regarding how to navigate the CRAZINESS in the field of climate science. Research and other professional activities are professionally rewarded only if they are channeled in certain directions approved by a politicized academic establishment  funding, ease of getting your papers published, getting hired in prestigious positions, appointments to prestigious committees and boards, professional recognition, etc.   How young scientists are to navigate all this is beyond me, and it often becomes a battle of scientific integrity versus career suicide (I have worked through these issues with a number of skeptical young scientists)."  Judith Curry on her decision to quite GATech and academia 2016

"Prepare for impassioned speeches from a bunch of extremely scientific spokesdudes and spokesmodels on how Trump hates water and air, and how spending $ Trillions with a T to cool the earth by 0.1C in fifty years is a scientifically brilliant plan supported by 97% of all true moral noble and upstanding humanoids everywhere. Amen."  Willis Eschenbach on WUWT 4-6-2017 concerning the coming "March of Scientists" 2017